pages<\/abbr> 347-379<\/p>\n[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n
Language:<\/h4>\n
Spanish<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”justified” use_border_color=”off” _builder_version=”3.0.98″]<\/p>\n
Abstract:<\/h4>\n
The topic of the intellectual knowledge of particulars is one of the most controversial of Thomas Aquinas\u2019 theory of knowledge, because he asserts that the material individual cannot be object of the intellect, but it is known per se only through the senses. However, we intend to demonstrate in this paper, that the position of Aquinas is far richer: Even if material individual is not known \u201cdirecte et per se\u201d by the intellect, it is known \u201cindirecte et per quandam reflexionem\u201d. In his various works, Aquinas explains this topic holding the same doctrine but with a variety of nuances. We discover that there are different kinds of reflection of the intellect on the singular, and that we need to use concepts like \u201ccontinuatio\u201d and \u201capplicatio\u201d to understand their meaning. We also discover that differences between simple apprehension and judgment are significant on the intellectual knowledge of particulars<\/p>\n
Key words:<\/h4>\n
Thomas Aquinas, Theory of Knowledge, Intelligence, Cogitative Power<\/p>\n
El del conocimiento intelectual del individuo material es uno de los temas m\u00e1s complejos de la teor\u00eda del conocimiento de santo Tom\u00e1s, tanto por su dificultad intr\u00ednseca, como por la concisi\u00f3n con que lo trata en sus distintas obras. Este tema plantea un desaf\u00edo a la tradici\u00f3n aristot\u00e9lica, ya que Arist\u00f3teles afirma que el conocimiento de lo singular corresponde a los sentidos, mientras que al intelecto corresponde el conocimiento de lo universal. Para una teor\u00eda del conocimiento que afirma la inteligibilidad directa y en acto de lo individual material, este problema no se presenta, tal como afirma Allers. La teor\u00eda del conocimiento del Aquinate ha sido fuente de los ataques de sus adversarios principalmente por esta doctrina que ha dado lugar a lo que Canals denomina \u201cleyenda negra\u201d.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_button url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Full text” button_alignment=”center” background_layout=”light” custom_button=”off” button_icon_placement=”right” button_url=”https:\/\/revistaespiritu.istomas.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/Dialnet-ElConocimientoIntelectualDelIndividuoMaterialSegun-4885207.pdf” _builder_version=”3.0.92″ \/][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n
[yuzo_related]<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_sidebar orientation=”right” area=”sidebar-1″ background_layout=”light” remove_border=”off” header_font_size=”16″ show_border=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The topic of the intellectual knowledge of particulars is one of the most controversial of Thomas Aquinas\u2019 theory of knowledge, because he asserts that the material individual cannot be object of the intellect, but it is known per se only through the senses. However, we intend to demonstrate in this paper, that the position of Aquinas is far richer: Even if material individual is not known \u201cdirecte et per se\u201d by the intellect, it is known \u201cindirecte et per quandam reflexionem\u201d. In his various works, Aquinas explains this topic holding the same doctrine but with a variety of nuances. We discover that there are different kinds of reflection of the intellect on the singular, and that we need to use concepts like \u201ccontinuatio\u201d and \u201capplicatio\u201d to understand their meaning. We also discover that differences between simple apprehension and judgment are significant on the intellectual knowledge of particulars<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[783],"tags":[1131],"class_list":["post-6822","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-148-2014-en","tag-echavarria-martin-federico","idioma-spanish","tipologia-article"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaespiritu.istomas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6822","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaespiritu.istomas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaespiritu.istomas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaespiritu.istomas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaespiritu.istomas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6822"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/revistaespiritu.istomas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6822\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistaespiritu.istomas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6822"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaespiritu.istomas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6822"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistaespiritu.istomas.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}